Research Communication
Contact: Dr Simon Pardoe
Informing policy, practice or public debate is a vital output of research. It is a means by which a research project may have some lasting impact within and beyond the academic debates. For this reason, research dissemination is demanded by the UK research funding councils.
In addition, the process of articulating the research insight for a wider audience and directly communicating with users can help to inform and fine tune the research insight.
Yet without support, this important component of research may be ineffective, or may be simply overtaken by other pressures at the end of a project. It may even seem impossible when the researcher contracts and collaborations come to an end before the findings are distilled.
PublicSpace was set up with this experience of research in mind. We work with research teams to make dissemination possible and effective. We bring an understanding of social science research and of issues in the communication of scientific insight. We bring experience from further and higher education and have developed expertise in communicating research to practitioners and publics - usually combining film, printed materials, collaborative workshops and online resources.
Example project
Using film, PublicSpace distilled and communicated the findings from an ESRC TLRP funded research project by Lancaster and Stirling Universities.
The film was actually submitted as one of the two ‘nominated outputs’ from the project to the ESRC - an acknowledgement of its intellectual content and communicative value. The project was graded 'Outstanding' in its ESRC End of Award evaluation.
“I think this will be the most valued output from the project. Indeed it convinced me that the [whole research] project was worth the money....”
Richard Edwards, Professor of Education, University of Stirling (Project Co-Director)
“I was surprised at how I couldn’t stop watching it and how engaging it is … how good it is as an explanation of social practice”
David Barton, Professor of Language and Literacy, Lancaster University (Project Co-Director)
The ESRC TLRP have described the film as "dynamic, engaging and innovative”, and feature it on their website.
The DVD comes with a 38 page booklet, containing images from the film, a summary and further explanation of key issues, quotes from the research team, an annotated list of the published articles, issues for discussion, and ideas for how to use the film and online materials in training and professional development.
Copies were free to the 330 practitioners who ordered prior to publication. Further copies are available here and contribute retrospectively to production costs. |

more about the film and booklet
|
What we bring
Communicating research insight requires not only experience of communicating effectively with public, practitioner and policy audiences, but an understanding and experience of the fundamental issues and processes in academic research and in generating research insight.
Far from simply re-presenting existing academic reports in ‘accessible language’, communicating research involves understanding, elaborating and connecting the key concepts - to create a coherent narrative of the research insight that is both firmly grounded in evidence and relevant to the practitioner or policy audience.
For this challenging task, we bring:
- research training and experience in the social sciences and in education, and an understanding of the processes of making empirical and theoretical claims based on research evidence;
- an understanding (from linguistic analysis and science studies) of issues in making the move from a research claim to policy advice or practitioner / public understanding;
- experience of engaging policy-makers, practitioners, education providers, students and publics around complex social, ethical, environmental and scientific or technical issues;
- experience in producing documentary film and in writing and designing educational and public engagement materials to communicate research insight.
Our role as partial outsiders to the research project is important – we mediate between the shared knowledge, language and assumptions of the research team and those of the intended policy, practitioner or public audience.
Why communicate research through film?
Film has the potential to 'show' as well as 'tell' the audience the relevance and implications of the research. So, for example, images may show the context and relevance of the research while practitioners and researchers talk from direct experience about the issues and insights. By 'showing' what you are talking about, a film can prompt understanding and inspire changes in practice; it can provide a ‘hook’ from which the audience may go on to read more detailed reports and articles.
Film also overcomes some of the usual obstacles to dissemination. For example, communication with policy makers, practitioners and publics often requires the kind of detail, shared knowledge and practical insight that only those who carried out the research and participated in it can offer. Yet these participants may no longer be part of the project by the time the findings are ready to communicate. A film is therefore useful in being able to combine complementary insights recorded at different moments in the research process.
The final film can be widely distributed as a DVD, either free or with a price tag that covers the distribution costs and may contribute to the production costs or future research. A DVD with a menu can be viewed as a whole or in parts and therefore in a variety of contexts. Clips can be inserted within online resources and powerpoint presentations for conferences, workshops and classes.
Our focus is on creating film that is professionally and intellectually engaging. It has to be more visually engaging than the dull film-of-a-lecture often produced in HE, and yet more authentic and intellectually rigorous and engaging than a typical corporate film. We focus on communicating the intellectual value and professional or public relevance of the research, in a way that reflects the professional integrity of the research team and their institution.
|